not, or, and, if, ... (no, o, e, se, ...)
behave in quite complex ways which generate ambiguities.
The classical interpretations of mathematical logic are similar to the meanings of natural language expressions, but not identical.
Difference between the mathematical use and the everyday use.
e' il pezzo di frase a cui si riferisce.
Puo' produrre ambiguita' in lingua comune, poiche' non e' univoco il pezzo a cui si riferisce
es: "non_è_vero_che Giulio esce di casa o esce Giulia" non si capisce se il connettivo si riferisce a tutta la frase che segue o solo al primo pezzo.
in astratto come fatto dalla logica astratta, un connettivo linguistico e' un operatore su variabili logiche, che produce una nuova variabile logica.
Non ci sono piu' le frasi di partenza che si riferiscono a un qualcosa e che possono essere vere o false, ma solo variabili logiche rappresentate da lettere, e che possono assumere 2 valori di verità: vero o falso.
Proposizione logica composta, col connettivo logico: AND "e" ∧
Proposizione concreta |
Risulta | Proposizione concreta |
In generale, in astratto |
---|---|---|---|
3<5 e 5<7 | vero | 5=3+2 e 5<7 | vero e vero |
3<5 e 5>7 | falso | 5=3+2 e 5>7 | vero e falso |
3>5 e 5<7 | falso | 5=3+3 e 5<7 | falso e vero |
3>5 e 5>7 | falso | 5=3+3 e 5>7 | falso e falso |
In generale:
la proposizione composta "P AND Q" è fatta da
La proposizione composta AND, e' vera se e solo se
entrambe le proposizioni componenti sono vere.
"P and Q" is true if and only if P is true and Q is true.
It appear to have defined "AND" using the word "AND".
If I substitute actual sentences for P and Q, I get something like this:
"London is in England and Paris is in France" if and only if
"London is in England" and "Paris is in France".
"Jack and Jill went up the hill"
Logic rewrite: "Jack went up the hill and Jill went up the hill".
Be aware: a sentence like "x and y are true" is a different use of the "and" and should think of it as a useful shorthand for "x is true and y is true".
OR used in mathematics is always the inclusive or rather than the exclusive or.
"not P" is the statement that
|
when the statement P is false |
|
when the statement P is true |
That is, if P is true, then "not P" is false, and if P is false, then "not P" is true.
|
then "not P" false |
|
then "not P" true |
ask yourself "What are all the exact circumstances that need to hold for P to be false?"
P | NOT P | id(P) | ⊤ | ⊥ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
V | F | V | V | F | |
F | V | F | V | F |
NOT e' un connettivo unario, non e' il solo, in tutto sono 4.
negation operator negates the truth value of the propositional variable. That is, if a proposition is true its negation is false and vice-versa.
identity operator doesn't change the truth value of the
propositional variable. It acts exactly the same way as to a number being
multiplied by one.
⊤ tautology propositional
variable whose valuation is always true.
⊥ contradiction propositional variable whose valuation is always false.
That is,
the tautology operator ⊤ assigns all values to be true
the contradiction operator ⊥ assigns all values to be false.
The former consists of statements like
"31 is a prime number" or
"The angles of a triangle add up to 180".
The latter consists of statements about mathematics rather than of mathematical statements themselves. For example, if I say, "The theorem that the angles of a triangle add up to 180 was known to the Greeks," then I’m not talking about triangles (except indirectly) but about theorems to do with triangles.
The sort of metamathematics that concerns mathematicians is the sort that discusses properties of mathematical statements (notably whether they are true) and relationships between them (such as whether one implies another).
Here are a few metamathematical statements.
In each of these four sentences I didn't make mathematical statements. Rather, I referred to mathematical statements. The grammatical reason for this is that the word "implies", in the English language, is supposed to link two noun phrases. You say that one thing implies another.
≡ propositional connective ≡ sentential connective ≡ logical connective |
≡ propositional operator ≡ sentential operator ≡ logical operator |
connective | operator | ||
---|---|---|---|
propositional sentential logical |
propositional connective sentential connective logical connective |
propositional operator sentential operator logical operator |
propositional sentential logical |
x | connective operator |